I was baffled when I first saw Breathless by Jean-Luc Godard. It was spotty, it was broken; it didn’t flow. It lurched forward, broken up by jump cuts that denied illusion. The rhythm was jagged, the air restive. I admired the audacity, the refusal to hide the seams, but I also felt held at arm’s length.
Michel (Jean-Paul Belmondo) and Patricia (Jean Seberg) were magnetic in their aloofness, but they felt less like individuals than phantoms conjured from the memory of movies. They bore the gestures of noir — cigarettes, betrayal, fatalism — but they didn’t have the ballast of life lived.
I come to François Truffaut’s The 400 Blows by a very different route. Where Godard faked, Truffaut completed and welded together. The wanderings of Antoine Doinel, the small rebellions and loneliness of so much of it; that final sprint toward the sea—they all held the burden of memory. Truffaut’s movie didn’t quote them; they spoke—felt confession.
The contrast between those two movies had a profound influence on my passion for film.
“Breathless” afforded me a new movie grammar: editing that defied continuity, dialogue that sounded like an aural memory of movies, and characters who knew their own fictions as films. Movies that could argue their own meta-awareness, with characters who made it hard to embrace them fully. Motion pictures that prized style and gesture.
Truffaut gave me something different. The 400 Blows was a movie of the heart, personal memories that affected and joined me with details from life, at once tragic and beautiful, intimate, tender, and authentic.
In Breathless, Michel is living an imitation of Bogart, aping his poses and gestures rather than developing his own identity. Patricia appears uneasily balanced between sincerity and performance, her betrayal less an act of the heart than a duty in her noir-scripted role.
Fatalism looms large over the film: crime begets betrayal, betrayal begets death. The jump cuts break time and space, echoing the characters’ split identities. Godard rates surfaces — style, gesture, reference — above psychological depth.
Here is the part where I go wobbly. I admire the boldness, the resistance to convention, and everything else that goes into making it a bitchy meta-noir, but I can’t root for the characters. They seem more like phantoms of cinema than beings I could know. Breathless is exhilarating to watch, but it keeps me at a distance, observing rather than being.
Truffaut’s 400 Blows is about memory and experience. Antoine’s tale is a story of neglect, rebellion, and longing for freedom. It captures the textures of adolescence, the cruelties of adults, the transient pleasures of fraternity and innocent love — that particular confusion when it feels like nobody in the world knows who you really are.
Its style is in the service of memory rather than commentary: long takes, naturalistic detail, emotional resonance. The closing freeze-frame packs a punch because it is honest.
Here, I felt aligned. I saw myself in Antoine’s yearning, in his desire to escape, in the run toward the sea itself. Truffaut’s cinema beckoned me in, to feel, to remember.
Breathless made me wish I were reading Cahiers du Cinéma in its original French to see the debates that produced such brazenness. It was when I figured out that the movies could be intellectual, self-referential, a game of style and memory. But it also made me feel uneasy, apart.
The 400 Blows made me want to climb inside the cinema. It taught me that movies could be vessels of memory,
I can recall the first time I attempted to fathom Godard’s jump cuts. I disliked their careless edits, cut with impatience. I later learned that it was done on purpose —a refusal of cinematic artifice. Godard wanted us to see the joints — to know that this is a movie we are watching. He tried to impress upon us the artifice and had us ponder cinema as something constructed. It was brilliant but distancing. I could appreciate it, but I couldn’t inhabit it.
Truffaut’s movie, however, made me forget the camera. I could live in Antoine’s world continuously. The long takes, the naturalistic detail, the emotional resonance — it all worked together to grab me. I didn’t think in terms of cinema; I felt in terms of life.
This division — between cinema as thought and cinema as memory — has shaped my own allegiances.
I like Godard, but I love Truffaut. Godard taught me to think about cinema; Truffaut taught me to feel for it. Godard’s characters’ aggrievement is of his design. Michel is not supposed to be sympathetic; he’s a pastiche of masculinity, a stance on Bogart. Patricia’s not supposed to be tender; she’s a cipher, half-sincere and half-performing. It therefore focuses less on love than on cinema’s memory of love. It is interesting, but it’s chilly.
Truffaut’s characters, by comparison, are fragile. Antoine is misunderstood, neglected, and longing to be free. Oops, this isn’t some trope; this is a confession. It invites empathy, not analysis.
In the end, I’m still a Truffaut enthusiast with little patience for Godard, willing or otherwise. There’s a lot to admire in Breathless: Its brazenness, its break with the past, its smarts.
But what I love The 400 Blows for is its heart, its memory, and its truth. Godard taught me to think in cinema; Truffaut taught me to feel into it. And when it comes to me, cinema will always be more than style — it’s experience, memory, and the reverberation that makes us human.
This is why, when I think back on my own mania for movies, these two movies come across as twin poles. Breathless set my heart ablaze with dreams of studying cinema, of reading criticism, of learning French so I could partake in Cahiers du Cinéma. It made me see that cinema itself could be philosophy, could question itself.
Instead, The 400 Blows aroused my longing to live within cinema, to sense its echo and glimpse my own life reflected on screen. It showed me that cinema could be memory, that it could be confession. I’ll also respect Godard’s boldness, but I will always love Truffaut’s tenderness.
And if I have to choose, I will choose memory over style, experience over intellect, heart over gesture. Truffaut will always have a friend in me, Godard makes my teeth grind.
Leave a Reply